TC 2.6 Home Page


ASHRAE
®
American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers, Inc.

ASHRAE Technical Committee 2.6
Sound and Vibration Control

Purpose of ASHRAE TC  2.6:
  To develop, promote and disseminate information and tools that enable HVAC System Engineers, Contractors,
  Manufacturers, and Owners to design and implement quiet air conditioning systems
.

About TC 2.6

 Programs

 Research

 Publications

Meetings

Sound Samples

Membership

 Past Program Files

Links

2011 Applications
 2009 Fundamentals

 Past Meeting Minutes

Room Sound
Test Method


Standards

Committee Chairman:
 
 

Lily Wang


University of Nebraska - Lincoln,
101A Peter Kiewit Institute
1110 S. 67th St.
Omaha, NE 68182-0681

 (402-554-2065)


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 




TC 2.6 sponsored two programs and one  Technical Paper Session at the Annual Meeting in Albequerque.  The two programs were well attended.  The presentations are available on this site under Past Programs.

  

HVAC System Noise Control for Classrooms

Sponsor: 02.06 Sound and Vibration Control
Chair: Robert Lilkendey, Siebein Associates, Inc., Gainesville, FL

Controlling the noise produced by heating, ventilating and air-conditioning (HVAC) systems is essential to the quality of the listening environment in classrooms. This seminar summarizes the guidelines/requirements associated with the ANSI/ASA Classroom Acoustics (S12.60), LEED for Schools and others; describes case studies of different HVAC systems used to serve classrooms and acoustical design guidelines to meet the various standards; and presents the results of mock-up tests of common systems used in the Southwest and other areas demonstrating how to meet the ANSI S12.60 sound level requirement of 35 dBA or less for classrooms.

1. A Review of HVAC System Design Requirements in Current Classroom Acoustics Standards
    Matthew T. Murello, P.E., Member, Lewis S. Goodfriend & Associates, Whippany, NJ

    Since 2002 several standards have been promulgated regarding the acoustical design criteria for primary and             secondary schools. This presentation provides a review of the current acoustical criteria established in the ANSI         Classroom Acoustics Standard (S12.60-2002), LEED for Schools and the Collaborative for High Performance             Schools (CHPS) guidelines. General acoustical design considerations for classrooms are also discussed and                 examples of each of the acoustical topics are presented. The presentation concludes by providing a partial list of         the school districts that currently have adopted the acoustical standards.

2. Acoustical Design Guidelines for HVAC Systems in Schools
    Robert Lilkendey, Siebein Associates, Inc., Gainesville, FL
    Acoustical design guidelines for HVAC systems serving classrooms to meet the ANSI S12.60 Standard                
    requirements will be presented, as well as case studies from real projects that illustrate the acoustical concepts.

3. Meeting the ANSI/ASA S12.60 Acoustic Limit for HVAC Noise in Classrooms
    Stephen J. Lind, P.E., Trane, LaCrosse, WI
    This seminar will confirm via mock-up acoustical tests that the background noise level requirements of 35 dBA for
    HVAC systems serving core learning spaces contained in ANSI/ASA Standard S12.60, Acoustical Performance
    Criteria, Design Requirements, and Guidelines for Schools can be met using HVAC systems commonly used in the
    southwestern United States following guidelines for acoustical design from the ASHRAE Handbook.


Unique Case Studies in Acoustics
Room: Galisteo

Sponsor: 02.06 Sound and Vibration Control
Chair: Chris Papadimos, Member, Papadimos Group, San Rafael, CA

The seminar presents experiences of acoustic and vibration problems encountered in buildings associated with mechanical equipment and how they were solved. Attendees will appreciate common subtleties in equipment selection and installation and how to avoid potential pitfalls through some very simple but not so clearly obvious steps.

1. Acoustic and Structural Resonances
    Victor Wowk, P.E., Machine Dynamics, Inc., Rio Rancho, NM
    The acoustic resonance was a short duct section amplifying the blade passing tone of a fan that particularly
    bothered a blind woman in an office that relied on acoustic information to sense her surroundings. The solution
    was to slightly change the fan speed by re-sheaving. The structural resonance was stationary vanes vibrating on a
    vaneaxial fan resulting in a pure tone that was obnoxious in nearby offices. The supply fan was stopped and a    
    bump test found the stationary blades "sung" at 193 Hz. The solution was to modify the stationary blades thus
    ceasing to behave as a musical instrument.

2. Transmission Loss Testing of PTAC Units
    Jon Weinstein, P.E., Member, Industrial Acoustics Co., Inc., Bronx, NY
    Local noise code requirements can dictate acoustic performance requirements of ductless systems widely used in
    urban new construction and renovation projects. Noise transmission characteristics of these systems are discussed.

3. Controlling Audible Tones from Mechanical Equipment
    Roman Wowk, Student Member, Papadimos Group, San Rafael, CA
    What possibly could noise from computer room a/c units, fan coils, laboratory exhaust fans and screw chillers all
    have in common? Try audible tones! While the mechanisms that produce the tonal conditions differ, the end result     for the building occupants is the same – increased annoyance compared to uniform broadband noise. The
    contributing factors to the problem and the approach to remedial solutions will be presented with lessons learned.

4. Small Deviations and Big Failures in Vibration and Sound Isolation
    J. Byron Davis, Vibro-Acoustic Consultants, San Francisco, CA
    The difference between design intent and actual implementation is always a problem in real constructions. For
    vibration and noise isolation hardware, seemingly innocuous deviations can result in major deficiencies in
    performance. From hardware selection to installation and adjustment, isolation systems present significant
    challenges. In this presentation, we offer photographs gathered over the past five years of problematic rotating
    systems. Categories of failure are identified, and the photographic presentation highlights subtle errors that can
    lead to big problems later.


Effects of Mechanical System Noise on Human Performance and Perception
Room: Dona Ana

Sponsor: 02.06 Sound and Vibration Control, 02.01 Physiology and Human Environment
Chair: Kenneth P. Roy, Ph.D., Member, Armstrong World Industries, Lancaster, PA
 
This session presents the findings of two recent ASHRAE-sponsored projects that focused on the mechanical system noise in buildings, and the effects on human performance and perception. First, 1128-RP investigated how the noise levels and thermal conditions may interact to affect human performance and perception. Secondly, 1322-RP investigated the effects of ill-behaved noise, specifically conditions with tonal components or time-varying fluctuations, and discusses how the results can impact the indoor noise criteria listed in the ASHRAE HVAC Applications Handbook.

1. Combined Effects of Noise and Temperature On Human Comfort and Performance (1128-RP) (AB-10-017)
    Dale Tiller, Ph.D.1, Lily Wang, Ph.D., P.E., Member 2, Amy Musser, Ph.D., P.E., Member3 and Matthew J. Radik4,     (1)University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, (2)Architectural Engineering, University of Nebraska - Lincoln,         Omaha, NE, (3)Vandemusser Design, PLLC, Asheville, NC, (4)Union Pacific Railroad, Omaha, NE
    This paper presents the results of an investigation into the combined effects of noise from building mechanical
    systems and temperature on human comfort and performance.

2. The Effects of Noise From Building Mechanical Systems with Tonal Components On Human Performance and    
    Perception (1322-RP) (AB-010-018)
    Erica Ryherd, Ph.D., Member1 and Lily Wang, Ph.D., P.E., Member 2,
    (1)Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA (2)University of Nebraska - Lincoln, Omaha, NE
    This paper presents the results of an investigation of noise from building mechanical systems with tonal
    components on human task performance and perception.

3. Human Performance and Perception-Based Evaluations of Indoor Noise Criteria for Rating Mechanical System    
    Noise with Time-Varying Fluctuations (1322-RP) (AB-10-019)
    Lily Wang, Ph.D., P.E., Member 1 and Cathleen C. Novak 2, (1)Architectural Engineering, University of Nebraska -     Lincoln, Omaha, NE, (2) PMK Consultants, Dallas, TX

    This paper presents the results on an investigation of noise from building mechanical systems with time-varying
    fluctuations on human task performance and perception. It also discusses how the overall findings of 1322-RP
    impact the indoor noise criteria ratings listed in the ASHRAE HVAC Applications Handbook.

 

Want to become involved in Sound & Vibration Control issues at the Society level? Browse this web siteJoin the mailing list or  Become a Member, and regularly attend the meetings of TC  2.6 at ASHRAE Annual and Winter Meetings!  The next winter meeting is in  Las Vegas, NV Jan 29 to Feb 2, 2011 . The next annual meeting is in Montreal, QU Jun 25-29, 2011.

*Please note: The links on this page are provided as a service to the ASHRAE Community. The links are not endorsed nor approved by ASHRAE or ASHRAE TC 2.6.  If your organization operates a website and would like tLo have a link on this page please email the webmaster with an offer to reciprocate

This web site describes the activities of Technical Committee  of the American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Air-Conditioning Engineers, Inc. ASHRAE). It does not present official positions of the Society nor reflect Society policy. ASHRAE is not responsible for this site's content. To learn more about ASHRAE activities on an international level, go to the ASHRAE home page at http://www.ashrae.org/ .

Neil Moiseev, Shen Milsom Wilke, Inc, Web Master                                                                                                                                                                                                   ©2010 by ASHRAE TC 2.6

Bravenet Counter Stats
Powered by Bravenet
View Statistics